AdultBizLaw.com - Fattorosi & Chisvin

Case Law

The Case Law section is a premier database comprised of selected major cases involving the adult entertainment industry and related areas such as intellectual property and contractual disputes. The cases are primarily decisions from the United States Supreme Court and the various District Courts and Courts of Appeals across the nation. Although this database is meant to serve as a comprehensive resource for adult entertainment case law, this database will be updated on an ongoing basis. However, it is in no way meant to substitute for actual legal consultation.

Search by keyword or just browse the articles by title below.

Keep checking back as we will be adding content daily.

To view the case law as a word document , you may copy and paste from the HTML doc or in the alternative you may also download the case as a PDF file.

Some notable cases are;

Connection Distributing Co. v. Keisler

Recent 6th Circuit decision that invalidated 18 USC 2257 in whole in the states of Kentucky, Tennessee, Ohio and Michigan ONLY. Currently on appeal at the request of the DOJ for a full hearing by the Judges of the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals. Final decision pending.

Free Speech Coalition v. Gonazales 483 F. Supp. 2d 1069 (2007)

This is the recent challenge to 18 USC 2257 funded by the industry through the FSC. This is ongoing litigation and has yet to be finally adjudicated.

Miller v. California 413 U.S. 15 (1973)

The Supreme Court case infamous for the developing the current test for obscenity. The Miller Test for obscenity is still used in all obscenity prosecutions.

People (California) v. Freeman- California Supreme Court 46 Cal.3d 419

The California Supreme Court decision that legalized and protected the production of adult content in California and establishing the San Fernando Valley as "Porn Valley" and the center of the industry.


AdultBizLaw.com Copyright © 2006-2008

AdultBizLaw.com is not intended to be relied upon as legal advice. By reading this website, there has been no intent to create an attorney-client relationship. We strongly urge everyone accessing AdultBizLaw.com to consult and retain an attorney in your state if you are considering operating or working in the adult entertainment business. Furthermore, this site is specific to the laws governing California. Laws differ based upon jurisdiction and it may be considered criminal to operate or act in an adult entertainment business in your state or local area. Again, seek legal representation if you have questions as to your own personal legal issues.